Pushback from the Journal Cureus, who Retracts A Paper by Mead, et al, that Cites Enough Epidemiologic Evidence to Recommend Imposing a Global Moratorium on the "modified MRNA Products"

Dr. Peter McCullough stands up to say they "should be removed from the market" and "they are unsafe for human use". Now we see a confirmation of another eye-opener: Don't Trust the Journals or PubMed.

The above manuscript by epidemiologist M. Nathaniel Mead, MSc and several other authors including Steve Kirsch and Dr. Peter McCoullough, the senior author, called for a worldwide ban on the shots by stating they “…endorse a global moratorium…”.

This paper received an unprecedented, spectacular show of support with hundreds of thousands of reads and shares. It was skyrocketing throughout the world… until we imagine that someone picked up the phone and called someone, who called someone, who pulled the article.

Substack “Notes”

You can access Notes by viewing them in the Substack App, which tags you when someone Likes, Comments, or Re-Stacks your Note. It also tags you on your subscribed publications, so you know when a new article hits. Many of us have a variety of conversations in Notes, from awesome nature photographs by

David W Runyan II

to the spectacular images and content that

jeffrey p lubina

shares.

I saw the above article in Notes, and added my own Quote of support for Dr. McCullough’s call to his colleagues, that the shots should be pulled from the market. It wasn’t as strong a statement as I would have liked to see (did you notice the shortcoming?).

However, the retraction has now gone into effect, with a voiced ‘retraction notice’ that