Most important rule is taxes are illegal. Don't pay them and they wouldnt be able to fund the ceimibal agencies, create bioweapons, or spray death from above.
Best to use the word "unlawful" instead of "illegal". Legal is opposite lawful, not synonymous to it. Legal merely means rules to a game utilizing lifeless tokens for its players or beings recognized by its rules. In the world's game of government and religion, these tokens are called persons, which are either humans or corporations and the like.
Lawful applies to mankind made by God with life. A man made by god is not a person, human, nor corporation, but we are misled to believe so. We are living souls/stones, not dead ones.
The etymology of the word person yields it to be "a mask worn by actors on a stage or state". In Noah Webster's 1828 dictionary, the early definition of human is profane. The general definition of the same is "of" man. It is not man, but from man. This is a person. A legal man, opposed to a lawful man which is alive and breathes, is an animated man or a characiture of man; a cartoon character or fiction. This too is a person.
This word person or human has deceived all man into being ensnared into this fictional existance called the world and its legal rules and heirarchy of statuses and titles which do not exist in God's kingdom.
In the law, God clearly states He is no respecter of persons, nor can we be. See James 2:9-10 and Job 32:21-22. Very important regarding learning what sin we need to repent and amend to be baptized and receive the holy Ghost. It's an eye opener.
So, the IRS is part of a game, and is legal, but wholey unlawful for and toward God's people.
Hmmmm. Gramm-Leach Bliley Act (ESPECIALLY), Right To Financial Privacy Act, Bank Secrecy Act, Patriot Act, Consumer Financial Protection Act, Dodd-Frank, Fair Credit Reporting Act, etc. all being violated or "massaged" and bypassed or expanded beyond obvious scope and portended purpose.....not surprising but more than just the violation of privacy is what they're using it for (since AI is supposedly trained to spot correlations, apply algorithms, make inferences/draw conclusions and take actions proactively as well as reactively based on the data gathered....what data was it trained on and who else is using it)? Smacks of Central Bank Digital Currency & Centralized blockchain Ledger preparation as well that enables not only monitoring for possible "violations" of "imagined" crimes, but also for preventing or limiting use of funds representations (tokens or digital representations thereof). Wonder what Catherine Austin-Fitts has said about this as well? The "reach" into non-profits/NGOs, corporations, LLCs, Limited Partnerships, even Sole Proprietors has become pronounced and invasive, with limited exceptions (mostly) on personal accounts being punitive when evidence was found "linking" the individual(s) to unlawful business or personal activities (for example, marijuana shops or even owning or leasing land on which a store is located, active participation or use of funds in prohibited businesses, even patronizing them, etc.). Garnishments are commonplace already -- for whatever reason (court judgement, failure to pay taxes, suspicious activity, child support enforcement, etc.) and generally compel financial institutions to comply (seize or freeze funds) before disclosing that action to the depositor (who then works with the entity ordering the seizure of funds). Another related (not directly) concern is the Great Taking", as well as the idea of "Beneficial Ownership" and the ability for banks to collateralize funds or assets pledged as collateral to pay their own debts in a bank failure situation. See https://thegreattaking.com/read-online-or-download and https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/BOI-FAQs-QA-508C.pdf -- your funds/assets are at risk and are not considered yours, primarily. FDIC is woefully short on sufficient funds to cover even the up to $250,000 (based on account ownership type, not by account -- with business entities limited in total to $250,000) should a number of bank failures occur. Something big is afoot and this appears to only be a symptom of it.
Welp yes, if you do your taxes and have interest income. I can see that. Also they probably have agreements with banks to have access to people's names tied to an account number.
The federal courts depend on a stable supply of money in the Treasury, from which their Constitutional salary is drawn. This creates an inherent prejudice that is inescapable: Any lawsuit arguing, for example, that the Income Tax Amendment was not properly ratified or is unconstitutional, threatens the Government's ability to spend money.
UNLESS in the restitution sought, the plaintiff describes something financially feasible that sustains the legitimate and necessary functions of the Government, no judge will rule to shut off his own paycheck and unleash anarchy.
Congress is of course aware of this. The longer they spend irresponsibly and take no action to fund their own unfunded obligations, the more leverage they get over the Federal Courts. Our Constitution appoints federal judges to serve for life, "upon good behavior" (meaning of course they can be impeached for any crimes they commit), and Congress "may not diminish their salaries during their term of office".
Since Congress cannot directly cut a judge's salary as they would be sued, Congressional leaders engaging in insurrection against the People must work in clandestine fashion with people openly hostile to the Government, creating a credible threat that the money supply will collapse to zero and nobody will get paid.
The problem the Federal Reserve System created 110 years ago, vis-a-vis the Fourth Amendment, is it began using debts the Government owes, as collateral for bearer bonds called Federal Reserve Notes, which are the paper dollars some of us still carry. The Legal Tender Act then erased the distinction between a silver dollar coin and a Federal Reserve Note, making both "dollars".
Anyone who remembers the sad story of Houston's Ken Lay and the ENRON Corporation will probably recall that ENRON booked liabilities as assets to create the false appearance it was making profits when actually it was hemorrhaging money. Because ENRON could not pass a law akin to the Legal Tender Act, making their irregular accounting legal, the company leaders were correctly convicted of fraud.
This creates a big problem for the Fourth Amendment as applied to banking. The fact that the paper currency we use, is itself fraudulent, we are participating in fraud. Arguably that makes all of us legitimate targets of a fraud investigation, and worse yet, business partners with the same Government that is snooping on us. So IRS claims this makes the search warrant issue moot.
Every. Single. Time.
An AI data mining software… there are so many loop holes in IRS to reduce tax liability… everyone should be knowledgeable about the rules…
Most important rule is taxes are illegal. Don't pay them and they wouldnt be able to fund the ceimibal agencies, create bioweapons, or spray death from above.
Best to use the word "unlawful" instead of "illegal". Legal is opposite lawful, not synonymous to it. Legal merely means rules to a game utilizing lifeless tokens for its players or beings recognized by its rules. In the world's game of government and religion, these tokens are called persons, which are either humans or corporations and the like.
Lawful applies to mankind made by God with life. A man made by god is not a person, human, nor corporation, but we are misled to believe so. We are living souls/stones, not dead ones.
The etymology of the word person yields it to be "a mask worn by actors on a stage or state". In Noah Webster's 1828 dictionary, the early definition of human is profane. The general definition of the same is "of" man. It is not man, but from man. This is a person. A legal man, opposed to a lawful man which is alive and breathes, is an animated man or a characiture of man; a cartoon character or fiction. This too is a person.
This word person or human has deceived all man into being ensnared into this fictional existance called the world and its legal rules and heirarchy of statuses and titles which do not exist in God's kingdom.
In the law, God clearly states He is no respecter of persons, nor can we be. See James 2:9-10 and Job 32:21-22. Very important regarding learning what sin we need to repent and amend to be baptized and receive the holy Ghost. It's an eye opener.
So, the IRS is part of a game, and is legal, but wholey unlawful for and toward God's people.
This should stir up congress.. because it's personal! 🤣
Hmmmm. Gramm-Leach Bliley Act (ESPECIALLY), Right To Financial Privacy Act, Bank Secrecy Act, Patriot Act, Consumer Financial Protection Act, Dodd-Frank, Fair Credit Reporting Act, etc. all being violated or "massaged" and bypassed or expanded beyond obvious scope and portended purpose.....not surprising but more than just the violation of privacy is what they're using it for (since AI is supposedly trained to spot correlations, apply algorithms, make inferences/draw conclusions and take actions proactively as well as reactively based on the data gathered....what data was it trained on and who else is using it)? Smacks of Central Bank Digital Currency & Centralized blockchain Ledger preparation as well that enables not only monitoring for possible "violations" of "imagined" crimes, but also for preventing or limiting use of funds representations (tokens or digital representations thereof). Wonder what Catherine Austin-Fitts has said about this as well? The "reach" into non-profits/NGOs, corporations, LLCs, Limited Partnerships, even Sole Proprietors has become pronounced and invasive, with limited exceptions (mostly) on personal accounts being punitive when evidence was found "linking" the individual(s) to unlawful business or personal activities (for example, marijuana shops or even owning or leasing land on which a store is located, active participation or use of funds in prohibited businesses, even patronizing them, etc.). Garnishments are commonplace already -- for whatever reason (court judgement, failure to pay taxes, suspicious activity, child support enforcement, etc.) and generally compel financial institutions to comply (seize or freeze funds) before disclosing that action to the depositor (who then works with the entity ordering the seizure of funds). Another related (not directly) concern is the Great Taking", as well as the idea of "Beneficial Ownership" and the ability for banks to collateralize funds or assets pledged as collateral to pay their own debts in a bank failure situation. See https://thegreattaking.com/read-online-or-download and https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/BOI-FAQs-QA-508C.pdf -- your funds/assets are at risk and are not considered yours, primarily. FDIC is woefully short on sufficient funds to cover even the up to $250,000 (based on account ownership type, not by account -- with business entities limited in total to $250,000) should a number of bank failures occur. Something big is afoot and this appears to only be a symptom of it.
Welp yes, if you do your taxes and have interest income. I can see that. Also they probably have agreements with banks to have access to people's names tied to an account number.
Thank you Margaret. The plot thickens!
The federal courts depend on a stable supply of money in the Treasury, from which their Constitutional salary is drawn. This creates an inherent prejudice that is inescapable: Any lawsuit arguing, for example, that the Income Tax Amendment was not properly ratified or is unconstitutional, threatens the Government's ability to spend money.
UNLESS in the restitution sought, the plaintiff describes something financially feasible that sustains the legitimate and necessary functions of the Government, no judge will rule to shut off his own paycheck and unleash anarchy.
Congress is of course aware of this. The longer they spend irresponsibly and take no action to fund their own unfunded obligations, the more leverage they get over the Federal Courts. Our Constitution appoints federal judges to serve for life, "upon good behavior" (meaning of course they can be impeached for any crimes they commit), and Congress "may not diminish their salaries during their term of office".
Since Congress cannot directly cut a judge's salary as they would be sued, Congressional leaders engaging in insurrection against the People must work in clandestine fashion with people openly hostile to the Government, creating a credible threat that the money supply will collapse to zero and nobody will get paid.
The problem the Federal Reserve System created 110 years ago, vis-a-vis the Fourth Amendment, is it began using debts the Government owes, as collateral for bearer bonds called Federal Reserve Notes, which are the paper dollars some of us still carry. The Legal Tender Act then erased the distinction between a silver dollar coin and a Federal Reserve Note, making both "dollars".
Anyone who remembers the sad story of Houston's Ken Lay and the ENRON Corporation will probably recall that ENRON booked liabilities as assets to create the false appearance it was making profits when actually it was hemorrhaging money. Because ENRON could not pass a law akin to the Legal Tender Act, making their irregular accounting legal, the company leaders were correctly convicted of fraud.
This creates a big problem for the Fourth Amendment as applied to banking. The fact that the paper currency we use, is itself fraudulent, we are participating in fraud. Arguably that makes all of us legitimate targets of a fraud investigation, and worse yet, business partners with the same Government that is snooping on us. So IRS claims this makes the search warrant issue moot.
My what a tangled web we weave '
When first we set out to deceive!
Smacks of Vatican bankers.
I love this lady. ❤️❤️ She is such a trooper and fighter. Liz Cheney’s replacement 😁
Cheney would have never informed the American people what the IRS is doing.