McCullough Suggests a siRNA or RIBOTACs Vax to Cure A Covid Jab Injury - One that Causes No Soft Stool or Diarrhea
This is a CRIME. Do they think we are so stupid that we don't know that spike is eliminated in the stool? See the CDC's National Wastewater Surveillance System! BIG MISTAKE! You forgot about stool!
In a quite controversial but not an altogether alarming twist, Dr. Peter McCullough admits he wants to “help” the vax-injured - the problem is that he now wants to do this by using “siRNA and RIBOTAC Therapy” as a possible “antidote”.
AND he forgot that spike protein is eliminated in the stool! If this was a serious remedy, it would have been presented with stool spike protein levels before and after treatment, as others have done. And no diarrhea or soft stools? C’mon!
Unfathomable: An RNA Vax to Cure the mRNA Covid Vax
Five months ago, I had my doubts about whose side Dr. McCullough was on. This opened my eyes: In a bait-and-switch move, I saw that Peter and The Wellness Company first stated that nattokinase was the antidote to spike protein vax injury - and then they didn’t tell you (and they STILL don’t make it clear) that in fact, you need 3 different bottles of supplements (i.e., added bromelain and curcumin), not just the natto - and the natto is at a different dosing regimen than the bottle of natto sold by itself!
And now we see the truth!
He wants to “STOP THIS MOLECULAR MONSTER FROM DOING MORE DAMAGE”. Well, we all do but is that antidote going to come in 1 year? 10 years? Or, did Peter just run into a discovery of a lifetime?
Firstly, in the above article, Peter specifically states, as seen below:
“Hulscher et al” have published a timely manuscript for the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex looking for large markets needing new molecular therapeutics”
For the “Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex” link, he put in a pitch to his book. As seen below, the Hulscher et al link goes to a scientific journal article. And he says he and the authors are “looking for large markets” that are “needing new molecular therapeutics”?
Did the vax injured EVER say they NEEDED MORE RNA technology? No.
No, as seen below, the paper is YOURS, Peter. How could you MISS THAT YOUR NAME IS ON IT?
Let us break this down.
Here, we explore the potential of small interfering RNA (siRNA) and ribonuclease targeting chimeras (RIBOTACs) as promising solutions to target, inactivate, and degrade residual and persistent vaccine mRNA, thereby potentially preventing uncontrolled Spike protein production and reducing toxicity.
You are saying that spike protein toxicity may be controlled by siRNA and RIBOTACs. New RNA genetic technology might CURE spike protein toxicity.
The paper is freely available HERE, so you can see for yourself that Peter is saying that an RNA JAB may CURE the Covid mRNA jab:
The targeted nature of siRNA and RIBOTACs allows for precise intervention, offering a path to prevent and mitigate adverse events of mRNA-based therapies. This review calls for further research into siRNA and RIBOTAC applications as antidotes and detoxication products for mRNA vaccine technology.”
Really? An ANTIDOTE? A DETOX agent? Peter explains more in his Substack article (emphases are mine):
“It may seem unfathomable for doctors to inject more RNA to deactivate Pfizer and Moderna synthetic mRNA that has accumulated in the body after multiple injections. However, siRNA used today in my practice (patisiran, inclisiran) appears to be safe and well-tolerated only notable for injection site reactions.”
Wait a minute. Peter first states how unfathomable it is to think MORE RNA, another jab, could possibly work to deactivate jab mRNA. He doesn’t explain HOW, or WHY one would think of such a grand thought. Pause there for a moment, because he has NOT provided any explanation or scientific thought.
INSTEAD, he just wants you to trust him. I have to hear this again:
“However, siRNA used today in my practice (patisiran, inclisiran) appears to be safe and well-tolerated only notable for injection site reactions.”
He skips right over the proposed mechanism and goes right into a clinical study - or is it a study? Peter has already injected his patients with this stuff, and NO adverse reactions, really? It’s suddenly SAFE and WELL-TOLERATED but for pain upon injection? How long have you followed these patients to KNOW? We’ve been through this before, and people need much more convincing that it could be “safe”.
If it was a detox, then wouldn’t the body ELIMINATE adverse products in the stool, urine, or sweat? And wouldn’t that lead to a bit of diarrhea, just like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine may produce, as well?
Why aren’t the patients getting diarrhea like they should?
How is the toxin eliminated, if not through the stool?
Because that is what happens when spike is eliminated. Don’t believe me? Ask the CDC.
And the National Wastewater Surveillance System.
The National Wastewater Surveillance System, NWSS
Let us pause here again. The CDC runs a National Wastewater Surveillance System (NWSS), and it detects spike protein in sewage - so the government knows before doctors and hospitals know, which cities are increasing their elimination of spike protein in the stool.
You can even view the national trends over time, as seen below:
Not sure how it works? No problem, because the CDC tells you HOW and WHY they test wastewater for spike protein. You can even download this as a printable PDF, by clicking HERE:
Have you ever heard of this before? And has your city ever told you that spike in sewage is increasing or decreasing? Me neither!
I will end my discussion here, because the failure of patients having diarrhea as a side effect is too BLATANT A MISTAKE. If any therapy worked, patients get diarrhea or soft stools, period! They would have TESTED for it!
END OF STORY!
I think the rest of this paper is trash; it already told me everything I need to know: this is another HOAX.
Reference
At the bottom of his article, Peter places this clickable link to his paper.
I PRAY
I pray that Peter’s followers and subscribers can see through this lack of methodology and keep their eyes open to prevent being deceived by anybody, at any time. Father God, hear my prayer! In Jesus’ Name. Amen.
The Paper
Source: https://osf.io/preprints/osf/qxbgu
Thank you for reading my writings! I appreciate your support by being a paid subscriber, a Founding Member who can request article topics, or just buying me a cup of coffee! And remember: common sense RULES!
More injectable poison to solve the original injectable poison? I don’t get it. Have we lost our minds? What exactly is in the original poison, how does it work to kill & maim people? What exactly is in the ‘new’ poison, and how does it work to reverse the original poison? Are there any animal studies showing efficacy? Are there any other independent tests done?
IMO, this is truly most irresponsible, especially given where we are with the corruption of our whole medical research community, the conflicts of interest, etc.
This really came as a surprise to me, given all the tireless work Dr. McCullough has put in to expose the harms of the original shots. It still isn't at all clear what covid, if it exists, is (I suspect various types of poisoning on top of lots of deadly theatre (hospital protocols, denial of early treatment, fraud in labeling deaths as Covid, etc.)). Thus, no one can honestly say that some new mRNA treatment (or whatever they will rename it) has been fully tested and is known to be effective against vaccine injuries, that the medical authorities almost entirely refuse to admit exist. Even those who do acknowledge the harms, would admit that the mechanisms of said harm seem to be quite varied, and without knowing just what was in the vials we can't say just what confluence of factors caused what in each individual, let alone how to go into the cells of the body with some new technology to undo what the previous technology did.