USA Charges Dr. Kirk Moore for NOT Giving the Jab, while Germany FREES Antivax Nurse Who Gave about 8,600 Fake 'Covid' Saltwater Jabs to Elders Over Age 70
USA Charges Dr. Kirk Moore for NOT Giving the Jab, while Germany FREES Antivax Nurse Who Gave about 8,600 Fake 'Covid' Saltwater Jabs to Elders Over Age 70
As Reported by the DailyMail.com on December 1, 2022, 👀 LOOK at the Contrast in the USA, in the case of Dr. Kirk Moore.
USA Charges Dr. Kirk Moore for NOT Giving the Jab, while Germany FREES Antivax Nurse Who Gave about 8,600 Fake 'Covid' Saltwater Jabs to Elders Over Age 70
Addendum 7/3/24: If you are on Twitter, please retweet this: https://x.com/therebelpatient/status/1808213259625156963?s=46
Time sometimes works to mellow out people and their initial reactions. And sometimes, the passage of time results in gained information that makes one more tolerant and forgiving.
The Rebel Patient™ is my ministry. Thank you for the gift of becoming a free or paid subscriber. You can also BUY ME A COFFEE or DONATE to my Ministry, Thank You!
We don't know why they let this nurse get off FREE with 6 months’ served time. But it looks like time was on her side.
How Time Changes Things
According to The Daily Mail:
Anti-vaxxer nurse who injected up to 8,600 elderly patients with saltwater instead of Covid vaccine walks FREE from court in Germany
09:23 EDT 01 Dec 2022, updated 10:17 EDT 01 Dec 2022By Christian Oliver For Mailonline
The nurse in Germany jabbed up to 8,600 elderly people with ~saline solution
The nurse administered the fake vaccines and left people without protection
The defendant shared anti-vaxxer posts on social media during the pandemic
An anti-vaxxer nurse who injected up to 8,600 elderly people with saline solution instead of a Covid-19vaccine has walked free from court.
Red Cross nurse Antje T, 39, jabbed thousands of elderly patients at a vaccine centre in Germany with what she told them was the BioNTech Pfizer vaccine but was just a saltwater solution.
The nurse, who administered the fake vaccines at the Schortens jab centre in Friesland, northwest Germany, was given just six months on probation.
She was found guilty of six counts of intentional assault by Oldenburg District Court, Lower Saxony state, on November 30.
Antje T jabbed up to 8,600 patients who were mainly hospital employees, educators and doctors above the age of 70 between March 5 and April 2021, leaving them with no protection against the deadly virus.
Police told the court that she was able to introduce the saline solution undetected, because she was in charge of vaccine and syringe preparation during her shift at the vaccination centre.
But after more than a month she was reported by another employee who saw her use the saline solution instead of the vaccine on six patients on April 21, 2021.
The 39-year-old had additionally posted several social media posts where she openly emphasized her skeptical views regarding COVID-19 vaccines.
When questioned by police, she admitted to using saline solution but had said she only did it because she had accidentally broken a vial containing six shots and was ashamed to tell her colleagues.
She had also claimed that it was a one-time incident, but was immediately sacked after antibody tests that were carried out on the affected people confirmed authorities' suspicions.
In addition, Antje T's licence to work as a nurse has been revoked, media reported.
Following the incident, state authorities urged the fraud victims to register for revaccination and emphasised that it is completely safe.
Antje T in turn was initially charged with 15 counts of intentional assault at the beginning of the trial in November 2022, but nine of them were dropped due to no evidence.
Court spokesperson Torben Toelle said that the prosecutor found evidence that six syringes were changed for saline, leading to the charges, but that they expect this was done to many more.
During the trial on November 30, the shamed nurse apologised in court.
Concerning the defendant's anti-vaxxer posts on social media, Toelle added: 'The accused had shared various conspiracy theories on the Internet and on social media.
'However, the chamber could not determine with the necessary certainty that this set of ideas was the motive for her actions and that she then acted to sabotage a vaccination campaign.'
The verdict can reportedly be appealed within a week.
Meet Dr. Moore, who did the same thing but WITH informed consent. In other words, his patients ASKED for a saline injection and knew they were getting salt water instead of the jab.
Dr. Michael Kirk Moore is a 59-year old Utah physician now facing 15 years in prison for apparently simply doing what his patients asked -- providing vaccine cards to individuals who chose not to be vaccinated against COVID-19.
Isn’t that what doctors should be doing?
The Hippocratic Oath requires that doctors “do no harm” and as more medical studies and deeper dives into the Covid vaccines are being completed - a clearer picture is emerging that the Covid vaccines were experimental and too often increased unnecessary medical risks in return for dubious protections.
The government’s failure to conduct thorough testing on COVID-19 vaccines, and the near complete censorship of opposing views, limited the ability of anyone to fully exercise informed consent. This is a violation of basic ethics by denying individuals the opportunity to make decisions about their health based on complete information regarding potential risks and benefits. Dr. Moore’s actions were upholding the ethical doctrines of “informed consent” and “do no harm” to anyone who felt that they did not have all the information, wanted more information, or simply did not trust the information being provided by the ‘experts’ and they chose to not be forced to receive one.
Seeking to imprison a single father for doing nothing more than what his patients asked for and wanted is simply wrong. From what I’ve read, Dr. Moore did not charge his patients. The government, in its case, fakes concern over the destruction of actual vaccines. It’s almost laughable considering that Switzerland has destroyed over 10 million doses of the vaccine and even Canada has destroyed over 14,000,000 doses. Countries all around the world are destroying the vaccine as more and more people now have access to previously censored information, as well as new studies, empowering full ‘informed consent’ - and once informed, it’s clear that people simply do not want to take a risky vaccine.
Furthermore, Dr. Moore's approach exemplifies the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence, fundamental pillars of medical ethics. Beneficence emphasizes the healthcare provider's obligation to act in the best interest of the patient. Dr. Moore's provision of vaccine cards, without financial burden, underscores his desire to facilitate patient autonomy and enable them to engage in society while doing no harm.
The prosecution on April 24, 2024 has now filed a Motion in Limine to Preclude a Necessity Defense. In short, a necessity defense allows for defense of a ‘criminal act’ when it meets 4 criteria:
The defendant must reasonably have believed that there was an actual and specific threat that required immediate action
The defendant must have had no realistic alternative to completing the criminal act
The harm caused by the criminal act must not be greater than the harm avoided
The defendant did not himself contribute to or cause the threat
Dr Moore and his co-defendants certainly believe they meet all of these criteria.
They should be allowed to present any ‘defensive’ strategy they feel is necessary to prove their innocence—precluding it offhand has an element of unconstitutionality to it.
The government states in their motion that they did this based primarily on political foundations.
That is so far from the truth and is more prima facie evidence that the government is so far out of touch with the American people it’s embarrassing to call them our representatives.
There was nothing about this that was political, it was solely based on the ethical, moral and professional values to do no harm. The government makes bold, unfounded statements that mimic the indictment and want the judge to believe that their facts are a foregone conclusion, to the point that they believe there really is no need for a trial, let’s just string them up in the town square, like they did in the Salem Witch trials, the ultimate in vigilante justice: ‘what we say is the law, do not try to even oppose us’ or ‘we are stronger, more powerful and we will crush you’.
The government wants to not only not allow them the possibility to use a ’necessity defense’, but also to preclude using witnesses that would testify as to their own ‘need’ to seek them out to help them in their time of need, and also to preclude presentation of any witnesses that have been harmed or injured from the Covid ‘vaccines’!
A ruling in their favor would ‘streamline the jury trial, filter out the defendants’ improper necessity defense, and avoid wasting the jury’s time, misleading the jury, or confusing them with an irrelevant, unavailable defense!
The gall! Wasting the jury’s time with irrelevant information?! After all the jury isn’t smart enough to figure out what is relevant, what is appropriate and what can be used to determine guilt or innocence—we have to filter the information, as the general public is incapable of doing it on their own.
These arguments sound so familiar, don’t they?
‘We are smarter than you, listen to us, do what we tell you to do, and nothing will happen to you’.
“Take this shot and you won’t get Covid”
“Take the shot and you won’t give it your grandma”
‘We know what’s best for you’.
‘We DO believe in the FIRST AMENDMENT, but you cannot say anything we don’t agree with!!
Wow.
God Bless that nurse 🙏❤️. How courageous …
And I will pray for the good Dr.
I had a cardiologist laugh in my face in the hospital on Monday when I suggested my 84 year old mom was vax injured 🤕..